FFXIVCore.com - Final Fantasy XIV Fansite: My FFXIV PC build. - FFXIVCore.com - Final Fantasy XIV Fansite

Jump to content

We now have a World Status page. Make sure to check out our new forums! Reviews and Critique + World Server Forums. Also, add your world to your profile.

Subscribe to Icecreammafia's Blog        RSS Feed
-----

My FFXIV PC build.

9 Comments
The PC I ordered Friday night, tell me what you think.

CPU: AMD Phenom II X4 955 Black Edition Deneb 3.2GHz 4 x 512KB L2 Cache 6MB L3 Cache Socket AM3 125W Quad-Core Processor

HDD: SAMSUNG Spinpoint F3 HD103SJ 1TB 7200 RPM 32MB Cache SATA 3.0Gb/s 3.5"

DVD Drive: SAMSUNG 24X DVD+R 8X DVD+RW 16X DVD+R DL 24X DVD-R 6X DVD-RW 12X DVD-RAM 16X DVD-ROM 48X CD-R 4X CD-RW 48X CD-ROM 2MB Cache SATA 24x DVD Burner

RAM: G.SKILL ECO Series 4GB (2 x 2GB) 240-Pin DDR3 SDRAM DDR3 1600 (PC3 12800)

GPU: XFX HD-587X-ZNFV Radeon HD 5870 (Cypress XT) 1GB 256-bit DDR5 PCI Express 2.1 x16 HDCP Ready CrossFireX Support Video Card

PSU: XFX Black Edition P1-750B-CAG9 750W ATX12V v2.2 / ESP12V v2.91 SLI Ready CrossFire Ready 80 PLUS SILVER Certified Modular Active PFC Power Supply

Motherboard: GIGABYTE GA-790XTA-UD4 AM3 AMD 790X SATA 6Gb/s USB 3.0 ATX AMD Motherboard

Case: Corsair Obsidian Series 800D CC800DW Black Aluminum / Steel ATX Full Tower Computer Case

CPU Cooler: CORSAIR Hydro H70 CWCH70 120mm High Performance CPU Cooler

Any thoughts? Throw 'em my way. : ]

Posted Image

EDIT: Will have a new picture this week after the new case and cooler are in.

9 Comments On This Entry

Page 1 of 1

Karazaki 

27 July 2010 - 04:49 AM
Very very VERY similar to the PC i just built. I have an AMD X6 CPU and 4GB more RAM but thats pretty much the only differences. I scored 4400 on low and 4200 on high.

SSD it not worth investing in. For faster loading just get a 10000-15000 RPM HDD it will be cheaper and have much more space.
0

aj7418 

27 July 2010 - 05:59 AM
I am due to recieve my PC in parts all from new egg in the next 1-2 days. I chose the I5 750 but the rest is very similar, same exact ram etc.

I bet you will bench over 5k if you overclock. Looks like a sweet build though!

As far as the SSD, I did choose to get a 40gig cheaper intel version (was around 115$), I'll let you know how well that works in a week or so.
0

veveaucent 

27 July 2010 - 07:20 AM
I got the alienware Aurora so the case comes with CPU liquid cooling and an 850W power supply.
CPU
I have an overclocked Intel i5 Core 930 Quad 2.8GHz that's overclocked to 3.36GHz
RAM
2X3GB 1333MHz three channel RAM
HD
7200RPM 1TB HD
GPU
I have two, both the crossfire ATI Radeon 5870 1GB


Right now I'm getting 6100 on low 4500 on high, I'm pretty sure my hard drive is slowing things down, I may put a second one in and run it through RAID configuration so it can load the game from both drives simultaneously, the faster i can get the data from the HD to the CPU/GPU the more frames I can produce. What do you guys think
0

Skybreaker07 

27 July 2010 - 09:10 AM
AMD 1055T especially on a 3.6ghz overclock do not come close to scaling the potential of an i5 760 (2.8) ghz overclocked to 3.6ghz. An i5 would score 10-15 more fps than an AMD hexacore (1055t). AMD have been proven to be unstable and show less FPS when overclocked highly. I would suggest you get an I5/I7 if you are gaming.
0

Skybreaker07 

27 July 2010 - 09:13 AM

veveaucent, on 27 July 2010 - 08:20 AM, said:

I got the alienware Aurora so the case comes with CPU liquid cooling and an 850W power supply.
CPU
I have an overclocked Intel i5 Core 930 Quad 2.8GHz that's overclocked to 3.36GHz
RAM
2X3GB 1333MHz three channel RAM
HD
7200RPM 1TB HD
GPU
I have two, both the crossfire ATI Radeon 5870 1GB


Right now I'm getting 6100 on low 4500 on high, I'm pretty sure my hard drive is slowing things down, I may put a second one in and run it through RAID configuration so it can load the game from both drives simultaneously, the faster i can get the data from the HD to the CPU/GPU the more frames I can produce. What do you guys think

I have no idea what you are worrying about, sounds like you are more obsessed with achieving the highest score as possible and you forgot that this is a flawed benchmarking device which uses a window instead of full screen. People in beta using laptops to test this game in are using default settings with a score of 200-2500 and report of little to no lag with 25-30 fps.
0

balmung59 

27 July 2010 - 09:35 AM
Here is my own PC Config :

Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 o/c @ 4ghz
2 go of ram
GPU : ATI Radeon HD4870 o/c
Vista 32 bits
Motherboard : Asus P5Q Pro

I managed to get 3300 on benchmark, i was quite disappointed but i guess i should be fine running it.
0

j0xer 

27 July 2010 - 10:25 AM
the HD shouldn't effect the bench score at all since there is a separate number specifically for load time
0

Sans 

27 July 2010 - 08:43 PM
Should have gone with Intel and Nvidia
0

Icecreammafia 

28 July 2010 - 10:24 AM
Thank you for the reply's! :]
0
Page 1 of 1

Trackbacks for this entry [ Trackback URL ]

There are no Trackbacks for this entry

September 2010

S M T W T F S
   1234
56789 10 11
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Recent Entries

Recent Comments

My Picture

0 user(s) viewing

0 Guests
0 member(s)
0 anonymous member(s)

Categories